A, Masalah Analogi MASALAH ANALOGI: KAJIAN TEORITIK SKEMA PENALARAN ANALOGI

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published Jul 31, 2017

Main Article Content

Kristayulita Kristayulita
UIN Mataram

Abstract

Instrumen penalaran analogi yang menggunakan analogi klasik (analogi proposional) memberikan tiga posisi teori yaitu (1) penalar melakukan inferring, mapping, dan aplication; (2) penalar melakukan inferring, mapping tanpa aplication; dan (3) penalar melakukan inferring dan aplication tanpa mapping [21]. Ketiga teori yang dihasilkan diperoleh dari instrumen analogi klasik yang berbeda. Permasalahan analogi terdiri dari masalah sumber dan masalah target. Permasalahan analogi yang melibatkan masalah sumber dan masalah target ditemukan 3 skema penalaran analogi yaitu (1) skema penalaran analogi dengan langkah penyelesaian masalah sumber dan masalah target serupa; (2) skema penalaran analogi dengan menambahkan langkah penyelesaian masalah sumber dengan langkah baru pada masalah target; dan (3) skema penalaran analogi dengan langkah penyelesaian masalah sumber bagian dari penyelesaian masalah target. Berdasarkan tiga skema tersebut, memberikan  2 posisi teori penalaran analogi untuk instrumen penalaran analogi yang menggunakan permasalah analogi yaitu (1) penalar melakukan penstrukturan (inferring), pemetaan, penerapan, dan verifikasi; dan (2) penalar melakukan pemetaan dan penerapan.

Article Details

How to Cite
KRISTAYULITA, Kristayulita. A, Masalah Analogi MASALAH ANALOGI: KAJIAN TEORITIK SKEMA PENALARAN ANALOGI. Prosiding SI MaNIs (Seminar Nasional Integrasi Matematika dan Nilai-Nilai Islami), [S.l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 435-441, july 2017. Available at: <http://conferences.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/SIMANIS/article/view/149>. Date accessed: 19 apr. 2024.
ABNT APA BibTeX CBE EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows) MLA ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows) RefWorks Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only) Turabian
Issue
Vol 1 No 1 (2017): Prosiding SI MaNIs (Seminar Nasional Integrasi Matematika dan Nilai Islami )
Section
Mathematics Education
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

[1] Assmus, D., Forster, F, & Fritzlar, T. 2014. Analogizing During Mathematical problem Solving-Theoretical and Empirical Considerations. Proceeding of the Joint Meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36, vol. 2: 73-80.
[2] English, L.D. 1999. Reasoning by analogy. Developing mathematical reasoning in Grades K-12. Reston: National Council of Teacher of Mathematics. Inc.
[3] English, L.D. 2004. Mathematical and analogical reasoning of young learners. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[4] Gentner, D. 1983. Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy. Cognitve science, 7: 155-170. Diakses dari https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/38bf/b182de181738eb50e142e215c67f4cbb4fe3.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(83)80009-3
[5] Gentner, D. 1989. The Mechanisms of Analogical Learning. In S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (Eds.). Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press: 199-241.
[6] Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. J., & Kokinov, B. N. 2001. The Analogical Mind: Perspective from Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
[7] Holyoak, K.J., & Thagard, P. 1989. Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction. Cognitive Science 13: 295-355. Diakses dari http://www.arts.uwaterloo.ca/~pthagard/Articles/holyoak.analogical.cogsci.1989.pdf
[8] Holyoak, K.J, Novick, L, & Metz, E.R. 2004. Component Processes in Analogical Transfer: Mapping, Pattern Completion, and Adaptation. Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory, 2: 113-180. Diakses dari https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232593310_Component_processes_in_analogical_transfer_Mapping_pattern_completion_and_adaptation
[9] Krulik, S., Rudnick, J., & Milou, E. 2003. Teaching mathematics in middle school a practical Guide. USA: Pearson Education. Inc.
[10] Magdas, I. 2015. Analogical Reasoning in Gepmetry Education. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 8(1): 57-65. Diakses dari http://padi.psiedu.ubbcluj.ro/adn/article_8_1_7.pdf
[11] Mofidi, S., Amiripour, P., & Bijan-Zadeh, M.H. 2012. Instruction of Mathematical Concepts Through Analogical Reasoning Skill. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 5: 2916-2923. Diakses dari http://www.indjst.org/index.php/indjst/article/viewFile/30485/26413
[12] Novick, L.R. 1988. Analogical Transfer, Problem Similarity, and Expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14(3): 510-520. Diakses dari http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.510
[13] Novick, L.R & Holyoak, K.J. 1991. Mathematical Problem Solving by Analogy. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory And Cognition, 17: 398-415. Diakses dari http://reasoninglab.psych.ucla.edu/KH%20pdfs/Novick_Holyoak[1].1991.pdf
[14] Orgill, K.M, & Bodner, G.M. 2006. An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Analogy Use in College-Level Biochemistry Textbooks. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, Vo. 43. No.10: 1040-1060. Diakses dari https://www.researchgate.net/profile/George_Bodner/publication/227715603_An_analysis_of_the_effectiveness_of_analogy_use_in_college-level_biochemistry_textbooks/links/00b49521ce6ab5bc7b000000.pdf DOI 10.1002/tea.20129.
[15] Polya, G. 1973. How To Solve It. Princeton: Princeton University Press
[16] Ross, B.H. 2007. This is Like that: The Use of Earlier Problems and The Separation of Similarity Effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13: 629-639. Diakses dari http://old.nbu.bg/cogs/personal/kokinov/COG501/This_is_like.pdf
[17] Reed, S. K., Ackinclose, C. C., & Voss, A. A. (1990). Selecting analogous problem: Similarity versus inclusiveness. Memory & Cognition, 18(1), 83-89. Diakses dari https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758%2FBF03202649.pdf
[18] Reed, S.K., Dempster, A., & Ettinger, M. 2005. Usefulness of Analogous Solution for Solving Algebra Word Problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11: 106-125. Diakses dari https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232572007_Usefulness_of_Analogous_Solutions_for_Solving_Algebra_Word_Problems DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.11.1.106.
[19] Ruppert, M. 2013. Ways of Analogical Reasoning – Thorught Processes in An Example Based Learning Enviroment. Eighth Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 8). 6-10 February 2013, Turkey: Manavgat-Side, Antalya.
[20] Stavy, R. & Tirosh, D. (1993). When analogy is perceived as such. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1229-1239. Diakses dari https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229505901_When_analogy_is_perceived_as_such DOI: 10.1002/tea.3660301006.
[21] Sternberg, R.J. 1977. Component Processes in Analogical Reasoning. Psychological Review, 84(4): 353-378. Diakses dari http://portal.uni-freiburg.de/cognition/lehre/archiv/WS0910/analogiemat/3rdsitting/Vortrag/Sternberg%201977.pdf
[22] Basok, M. (2001). Semantic alignments in mathematical word problems. In D Gentner, KJ Holyoak, & BN Kokinov (eds.), The analogical mind: Perspective from cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 401-434.