LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT PERBANKAN SYARIAH DI INDONESIA

Main Article Content

Nila Aulina Rita Yuliana Muhammad Syam Kusufi

Abstract

This study aims to provide empirical evidence on the influence of financial performance; SIZE, ROA, ROE and CAR on liquidity risk in Islamic banks as well as on conventional banks which is used as controls. This research is a quantitative research using sampling technique and equality of size in taking the data. The data is obtained by the secondary data of annual reports of sharia banks and conventional banks listed in Indonesian Banking Directory for the period 2013 until 2016. The data technique of analysis data used with multiple linear regression applys SPSS 20 software. The results show that empirical evidence which are SIZE and ROE have a negative effect on liquidity risk of sharia banks and conventional banks. These findings confirm the theory of asset liability management. ROA has no effect on liquidity risk and CAR has positive effect on liquidity risk of sharia banks and conventional banks.

Article Details

How to Cite
AULINA, Nila; YULIANA, Rita; KUSUFI, Muhammad Syam. LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT PERBANKAN SYARIAH DI INDONESIA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional: Manajemen, Akuntansi, dan Perbankan, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 1354-1371, oct. 2018. Available at: <http://conferences.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/semnasfe/article/view/776>. Date accessed: 05 june 2020.
Section
Articles

References

Akhtar, Muhammad Farhan, Khizer Ali dan Shama Sadaqat. 2011. Liquidity Risk Management: a Comparative Study between Conventional and Islamic Banks of Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business 1: 35-44.
Anshori, Abdul Ghofur. 2008. Kapita Selekta Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia. Yogyakarta:UII Press.
Antonio, Muhammad Syafii. 2001. Bank Syariah: dari Teori ke Praktik. Jakarta: Gema Insani.
Arif, Nur Rianto Al. 2012. Lembaga Keuangan Syariah (Suatu Kajian Teoritis Praktis). Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.
Departemen Perizinan dan Informasi Perbankan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. 2017. Direktori Perbankan Indonesia. (online) di www.ojk.go.id diakses pada 21 Oktober 2017
Fahmi, Irham. 2013. Manajemen Strategi (Teori dan Aplikasi). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Ghenimi, dan Omri. 2015. Liquidity Risk Management: A Comparative Study between Islamic and Conventional Banks. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review ISSN: 2223-5833 DOI: 10.4172/2223-5833.1000166
Ghozali, Imam. 2016. Aplikasi Analisis Multivatiete dengan Program IBM SPSS 23. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Greuning, Hennie van, dan Bratanovic, Senja Brajovic. 2011. Analisis Resiko Perbankan, Edisi 3. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Ikhwal, Nuzul. 2016. Analisis ROA dan ROE terhadap Profitabilitas Bank di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Al-Masraf: Jurnal Lembaga Keuangan dan Perbankan-Volume 1, nomor 2, Juli-Desember 2016.
Iqbal, Anjum. 2012. Liquidity Risk Management: A ComparativeStudy between Conventional and Islamic Banks of Pakistan. Department of Management Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Abbottabad, Pakistan. Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume 12 Issue 5 Version 1.0 March 2012. ISSN: 2249-4588 & Print ISSN: 0975-5853.
Kosmidou, Kyriaki and Zopounidis, Constantin 2008. Measurement of Bank Performance In Greece. South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics 1(2008) 79-95.
Latumaerissa, Julius R. 2014. Manajemen bank Umum. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.
Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan. 2018. Daftar Bank yang Dilikuidasi. (online) www.lps.go.id/bank-yang-dilikuidasi. Diakses pada 10 januari 2018.
Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan. 2018. Sejarah Pendirian LPS. (online) http://www.lps.go.id/web/guest/bank-yang-dilikuidasi/-/journal_content/56/10157/12612. Diakses pada 29 Januari 2018
Muhammad. 2011. Manajemen Bank Syariah (Edisi Revisi Kedua). Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
Muharam, Harjum dan Kurnia, Hasna Penta. 2013. The Influence of Fundamental Factors to Liquidity Risk on Banking Industry:Comparative Study Between Islamic Bank and Convenstional Bank in Indonesia. Diponegoro University. Conference in Bussines Accounting and Management (Cabm) 2012 1 (2), 359-368, UNISSULA, Semarang Indonesia.
Peraturan bank Indonesia No 11/25/PBI/2009 tentang Penerapan Manajemen Resiko bagi Bank Umum.
Peraturan Bank Indonesia No 13/23/PBI/2011 tentang Penerapan Manajemen Resiko pada Bank Umum Syariah dan Unit Usaha Syariah.
Ramzan, Muhammad dan Muhammad Imran Zafar. 2014. Liquidity Risk Management in Islamic Banks: A Study of Islamic Banks of Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal Of Contemporary Research In Business April 2014 Vol 5, No 12.
Riyanto, Bambang. 1997. Dasar-Dasar pembelanjaan Perusahaan (Edisi keempat). Yogyakarta: BPFE- Yogyakarta.
Santoso, Arif Lukman dan Sukihanjani, Tekad. 2013. Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Likuiditas Perbankan di Indonesia. Universitas Sebelas Maret. Journal & Proceeding FEB Unsoed Vol 3 No 1 (2013).
Sawir, Agnes. 2004. Kebijakan Pendanaan dan Restrukturisasi Perusahaan. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka.
Siahaan, Hinsa. 2007. Manajemen Risiko (Konsep, Kasus dan implementasi). Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
Siamat, Dahlan. 2005. Manajemen Lembaga Keuangan: Kebijakan Moneter dan Perbankan (edisi kelima). Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
Soemitra, Andri. 2009. Bank dan Lembaga keuangan Syariah. Jakarta: Fajar Interpratama Offset.
Sulhan dan Siswanto Ely. 2008. Manajemen Bank: Konvensional & Syariah. Malang: UIN Malang Press.
Sugiyono. 2009. Statistik untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Surat Edaran 11/16/DPNP 2009 tentang Manajemen Risiko untuk Risiko Likuiditas.
Taswan. 2006. Manajemen Perbankan: Konsep Teknik dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN Yogyakarta.
Utari, Mita Puji. 2011. Analisis Pengaruh CAR, NPL, ROA, BOPO terhadap LDR. Skripsi. Diponegoro University institutional Repository.
Widowati, Cici dan Indratmo Yudono. 2015. Perbandingan Manajemen Risiko Likuiditas Bank Konvensional dengan Bank Syari’ah di Indonesia. Jurnal dan Proceeding Feb, Universitas Jendral Sudirman. Vol 5, No 1 (2015).