Commercializing Traditional Green Spaces: A Sustainability Analysis of Telajakan Transformations Along Karna Street Ubud Bali

Main Article Content

I Dewa Gede Putra Purwanita Setijanti Asri Dinapradipta

Abstract

This study explores the transformation of telajakan—traditional green buffer spaces in Bali—into commercial zones, analyzing the influence of economic, social, environmental, and cultural factors. Telajakan, once important for maintaining environmental quality and cultural values, is increasingly being converted into commercial spaces, particularly in tourism-heavy areas. The research was conducted among 44 business operators along Jalan Karna, Ubud, where telajakan spaces are being transformed into kiosks. Data were collected using a Likert scale survey to assess the impact of these factors. The regression analysis revealed that while cultural factors significantly resisted the transformation (p = 0.008), economic and social pressures, such as financial incentives and community influence, had a greater impact. Environmental factors were not significant. The negative relationship between cultural factors and commercialization suggests that, although respondents did consider cultural values, these considerations were ultimately overpowered by economic priorities or cultural values were adapted to accommodate commercial needs. This study provides empirical insights into how economic forces and social dynamics are driving the commercialization of Bali's traditional green spaces.


 

Article Details

How to Cite
PUTRA, I Dewa Gede; SETIJANTI, Purwanita; DINAPRADIPTA, Asri. Commercializing Traditional Green Spaces: A Sustainability Analysis of Telajakan Transformations Along Karna Street Ubud Bali. Proceedings of the International Conference on Green Technology, [S.l.], v. 14, n. 1, jan. 2025. ISSN 2580-7099. Available at: <https://conferences.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/ICGT/article/view/3240>. Date accessed: 07 feb. 2026.
Section
Architecture

References

[1] Kato S, Hishiyama K, Darmadi A A K, Dwijendra N K A and Suprapta D N 2019 Open J. Ecol. 09 15–24
[2] MacRae G 2016 Ann Tour Res. 59 16–29
[3] Juniawati G R 2022 JP2WD. 06 276–286
[4] Prajnawrdhi T A 2018 MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 159, p. 01002
[5] Aryadiva I G N A, Semarajaya C G A and Astawa I N G 2019 JAL. 05 133-140
[6] Wijaya K M, Warnata I N and Mustika N W M 2022 ARTEKS. 07 289–300
[7] Aboulnaga M and Mostafa M 2019 Sustainability Principles and Features Learned from Vernacular Architecture: Guidelines for Future Developments Globally and in Egypt (Cham: Springer)
[8] Nasir O and Kamal A M 2021, Am. J. Civ. Eng. Archit. 09 219–231
[9] Mayuzumi Y 2022 JSRSAI. 06 423–451
[10]Kato S, Hishiyama K, Darmadi A A K and Suprapta D N 2017 Open J. Ecol. 07 1–11
[11]Brata B, Seloka I B and Wartha I B N 2019 Open J. Ecol. 09 171–182
[12]Hishiyama K 2018 jpasurban. 2018 39–56
[13]Harianggara D N M, Sugianthara A A G and Krisnandika A A K 2023 JAL. 09 231-240
[14]Slinker B K and Glantz S A 2008, Circ. 117 1732–1737
[15]Singh K R and Priya C 2019 10th International Conf. on Digital Strategies for Organizational Success
[16]Ruhanen L and Whitford M 2019, JHT. 14 179-191
[17]Lo Y C and Janta P 2020 Front. Psychol. 11 1-14
[18]Rapoport A 2005 Culture, Architecture, and Design (Chicago, IL: Locke Science Publishing Company)
[19]Daging I G, Martiningsih I G A G E and Arnawa I K 2019 IJCRR. 10 21229-21236
[20]Adhika I M and Putra I D G A D 2020 Geo J. Tourism Geosites. 33 1462-1469