Cultural Heritage Identity of Informal Settlements Based on The Social Construction Culture: A Conceptual Framework
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to conceptualize cultural heritage as a common identity in the form of urban informal settlements in the form of kampung especially Kayutangan village, Malang city, which until now has not received attention or been studied, especially related to minority stereotypes in marginalized local communities. The identity of informal settlements is in a dynamic-spontaneous identity polarization position as a negotiation of the history of marginalization and oppression, and on the other hand it is still trapped in a static condition of only enriching city artefacts without the involvement of the community. As a common identity, it means that cultural heritage is considered important by multi-stakeholders, both residents and external parties. The form of shelter as a form of cultural artifact is the result of social construction related to its technological culture, and its ability to become a common identity if there is intercultural awareness among its stakeholders. The research method uses literature studies over the last 10 years in bibliometric format. The bibliometric method is a quantitative method for analyzing bibliographic data contained in articles or journals. This analysis uses computer assistance to scientifically review publications related to a particular topic or field. The research results play a role in assembling a variety of related thoughts, and reviewing cultural heritage more broadly to strengthen identity, cultural diversity and shared cultural rights, as a common identity
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
[2] C. DeSilvey and R. Harrison, “Anticipating loss: rethinking endangerment in heritage futures,” International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 26, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 2020.
[3] J. Zhang, K. Xiong, Z. Liu, and L. He, “Research progress and knowledge system of world heritage tourism: a bibliometric analysis,” Heritage Science, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 42, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40494-022-00654-0.
[4] M. Lombard, “Constructing ordinary places: Place-making in urban informal settlements in Mexico,” Progress in Planning, vol. 94, pp. 1–53, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2013.05.003.
[5] N. Ujang and K. Zakariya, “The Notion of Place, Place Meaning and Identity in Urban Regeneration,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 170, pp. 709–717, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.073.
[6] Fauziah, Nur, N. Fauziah, A. Antariksa, and J. Ernawati, “Kualitas Visual Fasade Bangunan Modern Pasca Kolonial di Jalan Kayutangan Malang,” Review of Urbanism and Architectural Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, Art. no. 2, 2012, doi: 10.21776/ub.ruas.2012.010.02.2.
[7] S. Watson and E. Waterton, “Material Culture Review Reading the Visual: Representation and Narrative in the Construction of Heritage,” Material Culture Review, vol. 71, pp. 84–97, 2010.
[8] D. E. Bauer, “Emergent identity, cultural heritage, and El Mestizaje: Notes from the ecuadorian coast,” Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies, vol. 21, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 2012.
[9] I. Torres, “Branding slums: A community-driven strategy for urban inclusion in Rio de Janeiro,” Journal of Place Management and Development, vol. 5, no. 3, Art. no. 3, 2012, doi: 10.1108/17538331211269611.
[10] S. H. Cassel and T. M. Maureira, “Performing identity and culture in Indigenous tourism–a study of Indigenous communities in Québec, Canada,” Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, vol. 15, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 2017.
[11] L. D. Pietro, R. G. Mugion, and M. F. Renzi, “Heritage and identity: technology, values and visitor experiences,” Journal of Heritage Tourism, vol. 13, no. 2, Art. no. 2, 2018.
[12] P. B. Rambhakta, “URBAN CULTURAL HERITAGE - A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK,” Geographical Analysis, vol. 9, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.53989/bu.ga.v9i1.3.
[13] I. Poulios, “Discussing strategy in heritage conservation: Living heritage approach as an example of strategic innovation,” Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, vol. 4, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 2014, doi: 10.1108/JCHMSD-10-2012-0048.
[14] J. Choi and S. Park, “Understanding the operation of contextual compatibility through the relationships among heritage intensity, context density, and regulation degree,” Buildings, vol. 11, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.3390/buildings11010025.
[15] J. F. Coeterier, “Lay people’s evaluation of historic sites,” Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 59, no. 2, Art. no. 2, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00007-5.
[16] S. M. C. Porto, P. M. Leanza, and G. Cascone, “Developing Interpretation Plans to Promote Traditional Rural Buildings as Built Heritage Attractions,” International Journal of Tourism Research, vol. 14, no. 5, Art. no. 5, 2012, doi: 10.1002/jtr.869.
[17] A. Limone and M. Marinovic, “The Theory of the Organization and the New Paradigms,” Open Journal of Business and Management, vol. 01, no. 02, Art. no. 02, 2013, doi: 10.4236/ojbm.2013.12005.
[18] R. P. Lejano and C. D. Bianco, “The logic of informality: Pattern and process in a São Paulo favela,” Geoforum, vol. 91, pp. 195–205, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.03.005.
[19] P. Kellett, “ORIGINAL COPIES? Imitative Design Practices in Informal Settlements,” International Journal of Architectural Research Peter Kellett Archnet-IJAR, vol. 7, pp. 151–161, 2013.
[20] C. Klaufus, “Dwelling as representation: Values of architecture in an Ecuadorian squatter settlement,” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, vol. 15, no. 4, Art. no. 4, 2000, doi: 10.1023/A:1010106609012.
[21] H. Kamalipour and K. Dovey, “Incremental production of urban space: A typology of informal design,” Habitat International, vol. 98, p. undefined-undefined, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102133.
[22] E. Pietroni and D. Ferdani, “Virtual restoration and virtual reconstruction in cultural heritage: Terminology, methodologies, visual representation techniques and cognitive models,” Information (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 4, Art. no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.3390/info12040167.
[23] A. Manero et al., “A systematic literature review of non-market valuation of Indigenous peoples’ values: Current knowledge, best-practice and framing questions for future research,” Ecosystem Services, vol. 54, p. undefined-undefined, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101417.
[24] W. Logan, “Cultural diversity, cultural heritage and human rights: Towards heritage management as human rights-based cultural practice,” International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 18, no. 3, Art. no. 3, 2012.
[25] J. Jokilehto, “Human rights and cultural heritage. Observations on the recognition of human rights in the international doctrine,” International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 18, no. 3, Art. no. 3, 2012.
[26] S. R. Shimray and C. K. Ramaiah, “Factors of influence on sharing of cultural heritage knowledge,” VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, vol. 52, no. 2, Art. no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.1108/VJIKMS-04-2020-0074.
[27] Sara and S. Yousefikhah, “Sociology of innovation: Social construction of technology perspective,” AD-minister, pp. 31–43, 2017, doi: 10.17230/ad-minister.30.2.
[28] K. Nordgren and M. Johansson, “Intercultural historical learning: a conceptual framework,” Journal of Curriculum Studies, vol. 47, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 2015.
[29] W. Baker, “From cultural awareness to intercultural awareness: Culture in ELT,” ELT Journal, vol. 66, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 2012, doi: 10.1093/elt/ccr017.