Performance Description of Untung Suropati Green Terminal in Pasuruan
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Untung Suropati Terminal is a road transport passenger terminal with Type B in Pasuruan City that serves public transportation between cities in the province of East Java. At this time the Untung Suropati terminal is quiet from visitors and public transport vehicles. The condition of the physical building is mostly damaged. This study aims to perform user voice description of the performance of Untung Suropati terminal. The description describes the level of user satisfaction. Description refers to the principles of green terminal using statistical descriptions method. The results achieve 12 performance variables are Security (X1), Safety and Health (X2), Responsibility (X3), Building Utility (X4), Architectural Esthetics (X5), Ease and Affordability (X6), Reliability Transportation (X7), Building Durability (X8), Frequency and Density (X9), Comfort and Regularity (X10), Availability and Capacity of Public Facilities (X11), and Implementation of Environmentall-Friendly Concepts (X12). The satisfactory scale (scale 4) was obtained for 11 performance variables and only 1 variable gets scores on a very satisfactory scale (scale 5) that the variable of Ease and Affordability (X6).
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
[2] Huda, Miftahul. 2013. Analisis of Important Factors Evaluation Criteria for Green Building. The International Journal Of Engineering And Science (IJES) Volume 2 Issue 12 Pages 41-47 ISSN (e): 2319 – 1813 ISSN (p): 2319 – 1805.
[3] Ervianto , Wulfram. 2013. Study of Road Infrastructure Green Concstruction Factor based on Greenroad and Invest rating System. Proceeding of Konferensi National Conference of Civil Engineering 7. University of Sebelas Maret (UNS) – Surakarta
[4] Abad, Raymund Paolo. 2013. Improved Transport Terminal Utilization: The Case of Jordan Wharf Guimaras. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies-Vol.9. Civil Engineering Department, De La Salle University, Manila, 1004,Philippines
[5] Bovea, M.D. 2014. Integration of Customer, Cost, and Environmental Requirements in Product Design: An Application of Green QFD. Journal of Technology. Departamento de Tecnología, Universitat Jaume I Spain.
[6] Adewumi, Emmanuel. 2014. Critical assessment of Port Elizabeth Bus Rapid Transit system. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering Volume 2 -Issue 1 (2014) pp: 01-09 ISSN: 2321-8193
[7] Rathod, Gopinath. 2014. Application of ECQFD For Enabling Environmentally Conscious Design. Proceeding of International Conference on Engineering Research, Dehradun. ISBN: 978-93-84209-11-7
[8] Sedayu, Agung. 2014a. Service Improvement Target Of Purwoasri Terminal Kediri With IPA and QFD. Eco Rekayasa Journal ISSN 1907:4026. University of Muhammadiyah Surakarta (UMS)
[9] Sedayu, Agung. 2014b. Importance-Performance Analysis to Arjosari Terminal. DIMENSI − Journal of Architecture and Built Environment, Vol. 41, No. 2, December 2014 ISSN 0126-219X (print)/ISSN 2338-7858 (online). Surabaya: Petra Christian University
[10] Komalasari, Rahayu Indah. 2014. Green Building Assessment Based on Energy Efficiency and Conservation (EEC) Category at Pascasarjana B Building Diponegoro University-Semarang. American Journal of Energy Research, 2014, Vol. 2, No. 2, 42-46
[11] Sugiama, A Gima. 2015. The Synergistic Model of Quality Service Design of Green Open Space Asset Through QFD. Final Report of Research Politeknik Negeri Bandung