GREEN INNOVATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY: IMPLICATIONS FOR BUSINESS MANAGEMENT

  • Widia Febriana Universitas Bumigora
  • Rina Komala
  • Ridha Nurul Hayati
  • Sacila Agrizkiana Angelita

Abstract

The growing urgency of climate change and resource depletion has positioned environmental sustainability as a central concern in contemporary business management. Green innovation, which integrates ecological considerations into products, processes, and organizational strategies, has become a critical driver for firms seeking both competitiveness and responsibility. This paper explores the implications of green innovation for business management practices, emphasizing how organizations can balance environmental goals with economic performance. Drawing on recent literature and global case examples, the study highlights three key dimensions: the role of sustainable supply chains, the integration of green technologies, and the influence of corporate governance in fostering eco-friendly initiatives. The findings suggest that businesses adopting green innovation not only reduce environmental risks but also enhance long-term resilience, strengthen stakeholder trust, and create new market opportunities. However, challenges such as high implementation costs, limited regulatory alignment, and resistance to organizational change remain significant barriers. For managers, the implications extend beyond compliance, requiring a reconfiguration of strategic planning, investment decisions, and performance measurement systems. This paper concludes that embedding green innovation within business management is not merely a response to external pressures but an essential pathway to sustainable growth and competitive advantage in the global economy.


Author Biographies

Widia Febriana, Universitas Bumigora

 

Ridha Nurul Hayati

 

References

Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.8925233

Buallay, A. (2019). Sustainability reporting and firm’s performance: Comparative study between manufacturing and banking sectors. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(3), 446–463. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2018-0371

Chen, Y. S., Lai, S. B., & Wen, C. T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.

Dangelico, R. M., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming green product innovation: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280033

Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact—The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005

Kemp, R., & Pearson, P. (2007). Final report MEI project about measuring eco-innovation. UM Merit, Maastricht.

Liu, X., & Bai, Y. (2014). An exploration of firms’ awareness and behavior of developing circular economy: An empirical research in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 87, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.04.002

OECD. (2018). Business models for the circular economy: Opportunities and challenges for policy. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/g2g9dd62-en

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 62–77.

Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97

Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation—Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3

Renwick, D. W. S., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013). Green human resource management: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x

Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559. https://doi.org/10.5465/257052

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.
Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green supply‐chain management: A state‐of‐the‐art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x

Yong, J. Y., Yusliza, M. Y., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Sehnem, S. (2020). Green human resource management and green innovation: A systematic review and future research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123456

Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2008). Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.029
Published
2025-10-16
How to Cite
FEBRIANA, Widia et al. GREEN INNOVATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY: IMPLICATIONS FOR BUSINESS MANAGEMENT. Proceedings of the International Conference of Islamic Economics and Business (ICONIES), [S.l.], v. 11, n. 1, p. 1659-1666, oct. 2025. ISSN 2541-3333. Available at: <https://conferences.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/iconies/article/view/3513>. Date accessed: 16 apr. 2026.