Enhancing primary school students' Chinese reading ability through artificial intelligence at Huacheng foreign language school, Sichuan province
Abstract
To address the allocation imbalance of reading teaching resources in western China's primary schools, this study took the Doubao AI platform as an auxiliary teaching tool, selected 50 sixth-grade students from a provincial AI demonstration primary school in Panzhihua City, Sichuan Province, as subjects, and conducted an 8-week single-group pre-test-post-test reading intervention covering pre-class, in-class, and post-class phases. Following the 2022 Compulsory Education Chinese Curriculum Standards, the research focused on three core reading dimensions: detail extraction, central idea summarization, and logical analysis. Data were collected through standardized reading tests, student cognitive questionnaires and classroom teaching logs, and analyzed by paired-sample t-tests, reliability and validity analyses, and descriptive statistics. Findings show that after AI-assisted reading intervention, participants achieved statistically significant improvements (p<0.01) in the three core dimensions and overall reading scores, confirming the intervention's effectiveness. The proportion of students with intermediate to advanced reading proficiency increased from 24% to 82%, and all lowest D-level students were eliminated. Students generally gave positive evaluations of the platform, yet the tool has clear limitations in cultivating higher-order critical thinking. This study integrates constructivist theory, cognitive load theory, and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to explain how Large Language Models (LLMs) improve primary school reading instruction, proposes targeted teaching strategies for relevant educational stakeholders, and provides localized empirical evidence for promoting AI reading tools in rural primary schools of western China.
References
Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014b). Educational data mining: A review of the state of the art. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 6(1), 1–47.
Cao, X., Hong, X., Zhang, M., & Liu, Q. (2021). Preschool teachers' technology acceptance during COVID-19: An adapted technology acceptance model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 691492.
Cao, Y. (2021). Research on user acceptance intention of intelligent education platforms. Journal of Educational Informatization, 30(12), 78–84.
Chen, L. (2022). Current situation and optimization strategies of primary school Chinese character teaching. Primary School Teaching Reference, 18, 45–48.
Chen, S. (2022). Analysis of Chinese teaching strategies in primary schools in the new era. Region - Educational Research and Reviews, 4(1), 52.
Chinese Academy of Educational Sciences. (2023). Annual report on artificial intelligence education development in China. Educational Science Press.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Kamal, M., Malik, M. H., & Alsharif, S. (2020). Technology acceptance model in healthcare education: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Education, 44(3), 152–160.
Kamal, S. A., Shafiq, M., & Priyanka, K. (2020). Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Technology in Society, 60, 101212.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
Lestari, R., Putra, J., & Susanto, A. (2021). The effect of AI personalized reading recommendation on students' reading motivation. International Journal of Language Education, 5(2), 112–120.
Lestari, S., Usadiati, W., & Misrita, M. (2021). The correlation between students' artificial intelligence and their English reading skills achievement. Bahasa: Jurnal Keilmuan, 3(2).
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2018). Education informatization 2.0 action plan [Policy document].
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2022). Compulsory education Chinese curriculum standards (2022 edition). People's Education Press.
Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 122–133.
Roshanaei, M., Olivares, H., & Lopez, R. R. (2023). Harnessing AI to foster equity in education: Opportunities, challenges, and emerging strategies. Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications, 15(4), 123–143.
Smith, A., Jones, B., & Brown, C. (2019). The impact of cognitive load on primary school students' reading comprehension in Australia. Australian Journal of Educational Research, 46(3), 345–360.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
Vrugt, A., & Oort, F. J. (2008). Metacognition, achievement goals, study strategies and academic achievement: Pathways to achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 3(2), 123–146.
Copyright (c) 2026 Luan CHENG, Phadet Kakham

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

