AI in Vocational English Classrooms: Mapping Teachers’ Knowledge, Benefits, and Pedagogical Uses
Main Article Content
Abstract
The rapid progress of educational technology has caused big changes in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) instruction, especially in vocational education. Among these innovations, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a revolutionary tool that is changing the way teachers design lessons, assess learning, and engage students. Although AI has the potential to create adaptive and engaging learning environments, the ways in which vocational English teachers apply these tools to ESP instruction remains largely unexplored. The present study addresses the gap in research on vocational English teachers’ familiarity with AI tools, their perceived benefits, and the challenges they encounter when integrating these tools into ESP instruction. This study draws on qualitative data obtained through surveys and semi-structured interviews involving vocational English teachers in Malang, Indonesia. The thematic analysis was used to analysis and interpret teachers’ attitudes and experiences in leveraging AI tools in the classroom. The findings reveal varying levels of familiarity with AI, categorized as low, middle, or high, indicating different perceptions and practices of integrating AI into ESP instruction. Additionally, the findings indicate that teachers recognize AI’s contributions to enhancing student engagement, supporting personalized learning, and improving lesson efficiency. However, teachers also reported challenges, particularly regarding readiness, the need for continuous professional development, and maintaining a balanced relationship between technology use and human interaction. The study underscores the importance of teacher training and institutional support to ensure that AI serves as a complementary tool that enhances, rather than replaces, the human dimension of vocational language teaching. By offering empirical evidence from a vocational ESP context which is a setting rarely explored in existing AI literature, the study extends understanding and offers practical implications for sustainable AI integration in language education.
Article Details
References
Basheer C., F.B. (2025). English Teachers’ Perceptions of AI Tools: Friend Or Foe? ShodhGyan-NU: Journal of Literature and Culture Studies. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhgyan.v3.i2.2025.50
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.)New York: Oxford University Press
Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Granström, M., & Oppi, P. (2025). Assessing teachers’ readiness and perceived usefulness of AI in education: an Estonian perspective. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1622240
Harunasari, Siti. (2023). Examining the Effectiveness of AI-integrated Approach in EFL Writing: A Case of ChatGPT. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies. 39(2). 357-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v39.2.5516
Jiang, R. (2022). How does artificial intelligence empower EFL teaching and learning nowadays? A review on artificial intelligence in the EFL context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1049401. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1049401
Mahendra, M. W., Nurkamilah, N., & Sari, C. P. . (2023). Artificial-intelligence powered app as learning aid in improving learning autonomy: Students’ perspective. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 8(1).
Mao, F., & Zhou, J. (2024). A needs analysis of ESP courses in colleges of art and design: Consensus and divergence. Plos one, 19(6), e0305210. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305210
Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2236469. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469
Qureshi, N.M., Qureshi, F.S., Bandeali, D.M., & Akbar, S. (2025). Teacher Perceptions and Readiness for AI-Enhanced Teaching in Developing Countries. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies. https://doi.org/10.59075/8tsejm76
Saraswati, G. P. D., Farida, A. N., & Yuliati, Y. (2023, November). Implementing AI Replika in higher education speaking classes: Benefits and challenges. In ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching. 12(3),207-215. https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v12i3.76525
Sari, L.I., & Sari, R.H. (2025). AI Integration in English Language Teaching: Insights into ESP Teachers’ Views and Readiness. English Review: Journal of English Education. 13(2), 779-792. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v13i2.11505
Solichah, N., & Shofiah, N. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy in Early Childhood Education: A Scoping Review. Psikologika: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Psikologi, 29(2), 173-190. https://doi.org/10.20885/psikologika.vol29.iss2.art1
Yuniar, R. F., & Radita, C. (2022). The effectiveness of using “new big city adventure game” in enhancing students’ vocabulary mastery in vocational high school level. English Edu: Journal of English Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 55-65.
Zhao, Y. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Education: End the Grammar of Schooling. ECNU Review of Education, 8(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311241265124